Mr. Arshami provided an overview of the Road Impact Fee. He described the process by which new developments would pay an impact fee to cover road improvements and infrastructure impacted by new developments and increased population.
The process will include needs assessments of road usage today and future anticipated usage. The study will have a goal to broaden the Town’s long-term policy for using the fee for development. Presently, only the residential developments are paying the fees, but other development uses should also be paying the fees.
In the development of the Impact Fee, there is a specific methodology used based on the statute. Mr. Arshami explained that the process will be revealed as the Committee moves through the steps. He stated that the first meeting will include an introductory presentation. Each following meeting will elevate the process until the transportation needs are determined. At that point there would be a cost analysis which determines the final cost per trip.
Mr. Arshami continued to explain the process by which their study progresses. Service areas will be one of the issues to be addressed in this round of study as opposed to just looking at the Town as a whole unit. If the service areas are considered as sub-zones, any funds generated in a sub-zone must be used solely in that area.
Mr. Arshami stated that he hopes to have this completed in four (4) meetings. Once the Impact Fee is approved by the Town Council, the Impact Fee wouldn’t go into effect for another six (6) months. He added that it is anticipated that the study will take four (4) to six (6) months.
A discussion about the number of developments added since the last study in 2016 ensued. Mr. Arshami said that the data collected in this study will be used for multiple purposes including grant applications. Mr. Arshami referred to a document distributed to the members containing some articles. He then discussed advantages and disadvantages for this program. Mr. Cummings asked about other municipalities in the area, to which Mr. Arshami responded there were many in the area. Mr. Blocker asked how the infrastructure is funded without the Impact Fee. Mr. Eberly responded that the roads are funded through various grants, Motor Vehicle & Highway funds, TIF funds, and Bond issues, to name a few. Mr. Eberly explained the many issues when relying on the various funds.
Mr. DeVito asked about their mission statement and whether they are limited by the impact of the Road Impact Fee. Mr. Arshami responded that they are limited by state statute and road issues are one of the allowable items, but must be transportation related. Mr. Eberly explained that the Advisory Committee would look at how the community is going to build out for the next ten (10) years, with the help of Dennis Cobb, First Group Engineering. He continued to differentiate the funding between the current road situation and the future growth orientation expenses. Mr. Arshami clarified that the fee will not address the Town’s current needs, so that the new residents would not be penalized for the Town’s infrastructure issues prior to their residency. Mr. Blocker asked several questions about all of the incidentals included in building or improving infrastructure and whether they are included. Mr. Arshami explained that in some cases, the plans would determine exceptions. A discussion of the past priorities or projects ensued.
Mr. Arshami stated that state statute allows for waiver of fees under certain and/or specific conditions. He explained that the fee or fee structure will be set for the next five (5) years. Mr. Eberly advised that the Advisory Committee will make a recommendation to the Plan Commission. The Plan Commission holds a Public Hearing and makes a recommendation to the Town Council. The Town Council would adopt the final fee structure. Typically, the fee is collected at the time of the building permit, but a payment plan can be designated through an ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Adam Decker, Attorney; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group, Jay Gianotti, Arsh Group; Denny Cobb, First Group; and Rick Eberly
Mr. DeVito nominated Ms. Fathke. Ms. Vanschouwen seconded the motion. Motion called by roll call vote: Mr. Blocker-aye, Mr. DeVito-aye, Ms. Fathke-aye, and Ms. Vanschouwen-aye. The motion carried with 4 ayes and 0 nays.
Mr. Phillips turned the meeting over to Ms. Fathke.
The Road Impact Fee is used to provide future infrastructure and cannot be used for operational expenses or to correct existing deficiencies. Mr. Arshami described the typical eligible recoverable or non-recoverable costs. The benefits of an Impact Fee would include infrastructure for growth, cost effective development, long term financial stability, and a reduction in tax impact to taxpayers.
The Legal Authority includes the Federal level and the State level. The State law drives the mandated processes.
Mr. Arshami described the key steps in the Impact Fee assessment process which will determine the cost per trip. He then described the Transportation analysis process. Mr. Arshami explained the process to determine the trip generation based on traffic volumes. The common unit of measurement of facility demand and capacity is the Service Unit, which is determined by trip generation. He explained the process by which the Service Unit is developed. Mr. Arshami displayed a slide containing common trip generation rates. Mr. Arshami explained how the Impact Fee is calculated and determined using the previously described processes. He provided some examples to support the process.
In summary, Mr. Arshami provided a list of pros and cons of an Impact Fee. There were some questions and discussions ensued. Mr. DeVito requested a list of the committee participants and their capacity, to which Mr. Blazak asked the recording secretary to provide.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group, Jay Gianotti, Arsh Group, and Denny Cobb, First Group.
Mr. Arshami provided the process for conducting the Conditions Assessment. He stated that the Transportation Analysis would be addressed at the next scheduled meeting. Mr. Cobb summarized what the Transportation Analysis will encompass. The Population Trends and the growth were described based on the Census Bureau results. Growth projections are made based on the past growth trends. Next, he talked about the Housing Trends and the growth in that area to include new construction. Another area of the assessment process includes the Labor Force which affects the commuting trends. Land use drives much of the growth patterns and new developments. He described the land use inventory and the percentage of each use. He broke down the recent annexations and their zoning classifications. He explained the process by which they determined the anticipated developments from 2020-2030. Anticipating the commercial development is more difficult to predict. Questions and discussions continued.
Ms. Fathke stated that she needs more time to digest the information. Mr. Arshami responded that this information could be discussed again at the next meeting. Ms. McInerney asked for a working meeting in a week and start on the Transportation. Mr. DeVito stated that his mind is made up and that he trusts the experts with their study. Ms. Fathke asked for the document to be sent out as one slide per page.
Vince Frassinone resigned from his role on the Committee. Another member will need to be appointed prior to any decisions being made. The replacement would need to have realtor, builder or developer experience.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Adam Decker, Attorney; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group; and Denny Cobb, First Group.
Mr. Arshami continued with the Road Impact Fee presentation prepared for this meeting which will address the Conditions Assessments and Development Capacity. The agenda will include the recap of the development capacity, the discussion of the last ten year development trends, the discussion of the development capacity of the Town, and the anticipated development. The committee will have a consensus to make at the end of this meeting to drive the next steps.
He explained the sources for the land use for future development. Mr. Arshami displayed the developable land by zoning classification followed by the Commercial or Industrial zones. He displayed a map of the Planned Development. Mr. Arshami described the recent development activities based on the permits issued, then moved into the anticipated developments over the next ten years in Residential, then in Commercial. Questions and discussions ensued.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group; and Denny Cobb, First Group.
Mr. Cobb provided the results of the analysis which concluded the Town’s existing minimum LOS for an intersection is D. Mr. Cobb explained the various conditions that attribute to increased traffic outside of the Town as the area develops. A discussion regarding the existing intersections with deficiencies and how they will be affected over the next ten years continued.
Mr. Cobb described the process by which the developments impact the traffic based on land use by anticipating trips to and from a development. The different types of trips are broken down into percentages. Discussions about the trips ensued. The traffic will be impacted by new developments.
Ms. McInerney asked about the critical steps necessary to set forth a recommendation to Town Council. Mr. Arshami responded that they need to revisit the original schedule and discuss it at the next meeting. The number of meetings needed will impact the timeline.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group; Rick Eberly; and Denny Cobb, First Group. Adam Decker, Attorney, absent.
Mr. Cobb reported some updates made on the existing conditions. He listed many intersections with deficiencies affected by the study. Questions and discussions ensued.
Mr. Blocker asked about slide with the schedule. For the dates on the schedule, the room has been reserved through December 3, 2020. Mr. DeVito voiced his concern about the completion date and asked for acceleration of the dates to meet the 2020 calendar year. A discussion about the process for public hearing, recommendation and final approval. Mr. Arshami described the process for recommendation and approvals.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Adam Decker, Attorney; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group; and Denny Cobb, First Group.
Mr. Cobb addressed the items on the agenda for the day starting with the analysis of existing conditions extended to ten years, which is typically at a two percent (2%) rate. He listed the affected roads and noted what types of changes would need to take place over ten years, then referenced the cost for those changes.
Mr. Arshami explained the impact cost observations which include the significant amount of land the Town has absorbed, the reduction in capacity for Town developments, the contribution of the existing traffic amount, the new transportation related improvements, and the improved opportunity to assess future development patterns. It was confirmed that this process would be repeated again in another five years. The equation to determine the Impact Fee was discussed. Mr. Slager voiced his concern about the cost of these analyses every five years. Mr. Phillips confirmed that a portion of the fee would be placed aside for those expenses.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Adam Decker, Attorney; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group; Rick Eberly; and Denny Cobb, First Group.
A question and answer session followed with continued discussions. Mr. Blazak explained the process for waivers and appeals of the fees. Ms. Fathke asked about other municipalities that had the fees then discontinued the process. Mr. Phillips will do the research on that question. Mr. Decker described the legal requirements when amending the comprehensive plan and the implementation of the fees.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Adam Decker, Attorney; Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group; Rick Eberly; and Denny Cobb, First Group.
Mr. Arshami presented a slide of the fee comparisons from other municipalities. Mr. Phillips explained the actions the other municipalities have taken since enacting the fee. Some of the municipalities have greater commercial developments. Questions and discussions ensued.
Mr. Arshami recapped the Impact Cost/Development Type. The graduated rate of the fee over the next five years based on the land use was discussed. Mr. Cobb recapped the use of Pass-by traffic and the generation of the fee. The detail reviews continued and questions ensued for greater clarification. The committee was informed that the committee would make a recommendation, however, the Council could accept the recommendation, set the rate lower or set the rate higher, in the end. Ms. Fathke reported that the committee is informed enough to make a decision at the next meeting.
A discussion on the next steps with the Plan Commission and the Town Council. Mr. Phillips asked Mr. Decker for legal opinion about the process of amending the Zone Improvement Plan into the Comp Plan. Ms. Fathke added that at the next meeting they would make their decision, make a recommendation, then the Committee is done. Mr. Arshami reminded everyone that the Zone Improvement Plan cannot be completed before the fee is set. Without the fee being identified, the team is unable to determine what the zone improvements would be. Mr. Arshami added that if the EDU is acceptable to the Committee, they could, at least, start to write the improvements. He asked for a recommendation today based on the calendar of events with the Plan Commission. Mr. Arshami added that the recommendation from the committee would include the rate. A discussion about using different scenarios in the Zone Improvement Plan. Mr. Blazak stated that it was discussed that the Plan Commission and the Town Council is willing to hold a joint session. Mr. Phillips explained that the Committee has one job to do and that is to recommend a decision. The next steps process based on State statute was discussed.
The Committee discussed the rate options with the graduated rate in order to set a recommendation today. Timing on reestablishment of the rate was clarified and discussed for 2025.
Mr. Blocker made a motion to establish the Road Impact Fee at 70% of the calculated Impact Fee of $3,879.15, calculated on the net cost per trip of $372.64, increasing the fee by 10% of the base each year. It is recommended that the ITE applicable by-pass fee reduction be applied. Mr. DeVito seconded the motion. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: Dennis DeVito-aye, Doug Blocker-aye, Jack Slager-aye, Joan McInerney-aye, and Donna Fathke-aye. The motion carried with 5 ayes and 0 nays.
Mr. Arshami stated that he will develop the letter and email it out for review. Once reviewed, it should be officially signed by all five committee members. Ms. McInerney asked Mr. Arshami to inform the Committee members of the meeting schedules.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman
Also present virtually: Bryan Blazak, Town Council Liaison; Craig Phillips, Town Manager; Adam Decker, Attorney; and Denny Cobb, First Group Engineering. Taghi Arshami, Arsh Group joined that meeting at 10:28 a.m.
The Committee will need to discuss and make a recommendation followed by signing the revised letter by Monday evening. Mr. DeVito asked to review how the change affected the 2021 rate. Continued discussion ensued and the details provided based on the study. Mr. Arshami explained how the grants from 2019 and 2020 affect the cost of future development per State statute.
(Mr. Phillips left the meeting at 10:31 a.m.)
Mr. DeVito made a motion to accept and recommend the rates and dollar values in the listing published for year one, 2021, at a 70% fee rate for $2,463.68, for year two, 2022, at a fee rate of 80% for $2,815.64, for year three, 2023, at a fee rate of 90% for $3,167.59, and the fourth and fifth years, 2024 and 2025, at a fee rate of 100% for $3,519.55. Mr. Slager seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Donna Fathke-aye, Joan McInerney-aye, Jack Slager-aye, Dennis DeVito-aye, Doug Blocker-aye. The motion carried with 5ayes and 0 nays.
Ms. McInerney asked about the letter of recommendation to Town Council and if there needed to be any reference about the EDU for commercial and the by-pass reduction. Mr. Arshami responded that the letter was created in the simplest form and may not need to include some administrative details. The Ordinance would provide the details. Continued discussion ensued.
The letter will be presented to the Plan Commission on Monday, therefore the letter needs to be signed by each Committee member by Monday evening. Mr. Arshami confirmed the letter would be ready for signature shortly.
Respectfully submitted,
Anastasia Lowery, Recording Secretary
St. John Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Approved This 5th Day of July, 2023:
___________________________________
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Chairman